Friday, November 17, 2017

Where Does the Time Go?

I've been busy with a bunch of different things over the past year, and as may be apparent, none of those have been blogging. I may have been doing a good bit of musing. I've just failed to write most of it down, and none of it here.

What have I been busy with? I've been reading quite a bit, going to lectures and theater any chance I could, working to keep up with the maintenance on a couple houses inside and out, and taking Marcie to dog training. So no lazy bones here. I guess I've also been disgustedly watching the antics of 45, waiting for him to hoist himself on his own petard, or should I say Tweetard.

But, what good is a blog if it's not blogged on, at least periodically? So blog we shall.

Hey, how about those Pittsburgh Steelers? They played one helluva game last night, throttling the Tennessee Titans 40 - 17 and taking a stranglehold on their division.

I love my sports, and in addition to football, I enjoy watching college basketball and the NHL. So I'll be keeping my eye on the Steelers, the Maryland Terps basketball teams, and the Capitals and Penguins in the NHL. That last one only gives me problems of allegiance when they're playing each other. Then I just want a good game.

Of course the main reason I started this blog was to muse about my current reading. This year it's been all over the place. I've tried to read a bit more outside of the crime fiction genre. Right now I'm reading Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go. I didn't read the description of it, but I don't think I was expecting this great of a departure from Remains of the Day. I'm enjoying it and it's holding my interest, so we'll see what I think when I've finished it. I'm also listening to Since We Fell by Dennis Lehane, my car book, and my morning nonfiction, mind expansion book is The Intellectual Devotional, 365 daily one-page overviews of topics from history, literature, religion, mathematics and science, fine arts, philosophy, and music. My grey matter is just exploding all over the place.

Some of my other outside reads this year have been a short story collection by Flannery O'Conner called A Good Man Is Hard to Find and Other Stories, Gilead by Marilynne Robinson, The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion, and Born to Run, Bruce Springsteen's autobiography. One favorite is The Round House by Louise Erdrich. If I can figure out how to do it, I'll renew the Goodreads link onto the blog that shows the titles of all the books I've read this year.

So I've blogged and I feel good about myself. And just because every blog should have some other media in it, here's a photo of Marcie, and to start you thinking about the coming spring, some peonies and azaleas too.

Have a great weekend, everyone.

Sunday, October 02, 2016

RUM LUCK by Ryan Aldred

Rum LuckRum Luck by Ryan Aldred
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

RUM LUCK: A Bar on the Beach Mystery is the debut novel of Ryan Aldred. It is an accomplished effort, promising more to come from this Canadian native.

Ben Cooper’s wedding goes bust after he discovers his ex-fiance is obsessed with clowns, and not in a good way. Ben takes advantage of their pre-paid honeymoon arrangements in Costa Rica, taking along his buddy, Miguel.

He arrives in Tamarindo, Costa Rica, gets rum drunk, buys a bar on the beach using funds from a shared account with his ex-fiance, and gets himself arrested for murder. Things are not going as Ben expected in Costa Rica.

Arriving to the rescue from Toronto comes his friend and attorney, Victoria Holmes, freeing Ben from jail, and seeing if she can make sense of the fact that the man Ben’s accused of murdering is the former bar owner, Antonio.

Since Ben can’t go anywhere because the authorities have his passport, he decides to see if he can make a go of it with the bar. Ben finds that necessary repairs on the bar building and equipment will have him bankrupt in six weeks. He decides to try an idea he had of providing an amusement service to people who want to pretend to run a bar for a week. Miguel and Victoria throw in with him and their first client is Miguel’s Uncle Enrico, who takes to his “bar management” opportunity very seriously.

However, strange things are still occurring at the bar. Late-night visitors are searching for something, and accidents seem to be happening to Ben and Miguel with regularity. The police aren’t making any progress on finding another suspect, nor are they being very receptive to Ben trying to make a go of running Antonio’s.

What is Ben to do? He decides to do some investigating of his own, with Victoria and Miguel’s assistance, and Uncle Enrico’s enthusiastic meddling. Much danger and fun ensue.

Ryan Aldred has assembled an interesting cast of characters to populate his entertaining story. The bar environment allows him to introduce a host of varied personalities and situations that propel his story along. He does an excellent job creating the vibe of a tropical beachside bar scene, so much so that you’ll find yourself rocking to the ear-splitting music, enjoying the raucous conversations, and turning your nose up at the smells endemic to a busy bar.

When I finished reading this excellent debut from Ryan Aldred, I pulled up Google Maps and checked out the Tamarindo Diria where Ben and Miguel had stayed. It’s right there, a block away from the casino.

View all my reviews

Friday, June 24, 2016

Mitigating The Danger of Cars and Guns

On this day, June 24, 1966, the United States Senate passed the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act by a unanimous vote. Later that summer the House passed their version of the bill 318-3 and on September 9, 1966, signed by President Johnson, the Act became law.

The origins of the law can be credited to the work of one man: Ralph Nader, an attorney and consumer advocate, who a year earlier had published “Unsafe at Any Speed”, a condemnation of the General Motors Corvair and the American auto industry’s lax safety standards.

In 1965 there were 47,089 auto deaths in the United States, or 5.30 deaths for every 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The death rate was 24.235 out of every 100,000 population. The auto fatality rate had risen the past four years an average of 5.625%.

In spite of fierce industry resistance and reported attempts to smear the reputation of Nader, Congress passed the legislation creating the National Highway Safety Bureau, or what eventually became the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The bureau’s first director, William Haddon, developed a scientific approach based on work of a Dr. John E. Gordon. The work suggested that auto accidents behaved like diseases and were dependent on three factors, the host (vehicle), the agent (driver), and the environment in which the agent and host find themselves. They sought to improve safety in all three areas.

NHTSA regulations over the years have mandated safety improvements to automobiles (host): seat and shoulder belts, head rests, energy-absorbent steering columns, rollover protection, dual brakes, shatter-resistant windshields, and improved rear lighting (a center brake light and white backup lights).

NHTSA regulations have mandated actions on human factors (agent): stricter traffic safety laws, mandatory driver’s education, more punitive drunk driving judgments, mandatory seat belt use, and child safety seats.

NHTSA guidelines have suggested environmental improvements: the addition of edge and center-line stripes and reflectors, breakaway signs and utility poles, improved median structures, improved guardrails, grooved pavements, rumble strips, and highway exit crash cushions.

What has all of this work accomplished? According to the NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), in 2014, the last year full statistics are available and comparing to 1967 numbers when the NHTSA began operations, there were 32,675 traffic fatalities, a 36% reduction in absolute numbers. That is 1.08% fatalities per 100 VMT or a reduction of 79%, and 10.25% per 100,000 population or a reduction of 60%. Those are inarguably impressive improvements.

Wouldn't it be great if we could accomplish progress like that with gun deaths in America?

Gun rights activists love to point out that a gun can’t act by itself, that it’s the user that makes a gun bad. As if to say, “Well, that settles it; there shouldn’t be any legislation restricting gun ownership”.

A car can’t be bad by itself either. It requires a key, fuel, registration, insurance, and occasional inspections. And you know what, that car still can’t function, because it needs a driver. It is the combination of car and driver that can make for a lethal cocktail.

However, laws have tried to mitigate the dangers. Drivers must be of a responsible age and have mandatory education. They must pass both written and physical driving tests. They must have good vision, or be restricted. They must obey the laws or be punished in some way. Most would agree these are reasonable requirements.

Shouldn’t drivers of guns demonstrate those same capabilities and good judgment? Gun control, as least sensible gun control, shouldn’t be about restricting all guns from all people. But it should be about making sure someone who is buying a gun has the judgment and good sense not to violate sensible gun management.

If you’re a responsible gun owner, you bought your guns legally, you keep your arms locked safely away from idle or illegal hands, and you’ve educated yourself on the proper operation and maintenance of your weapons. You see good reason for keeping weapons out of the hands of people who have no business owning a firearm.

Oh wait, see that right there is where there seems to be a problem. Strident gun rights activists couldn’t give two beans about those illegal or irresponsible gun owners. They don’t think there should be any kind of mandatory education for something as dangerous as a gun. They don’t think there should be any restrictions on gun ownership at all, and that makes no sense.

Yes, just as no amount of vehicle legislation can remove 100% of the risk of driving on our nation’s highways, no amount of gun control legislation will reduce wrongful firearms deaths to zero. But it could make a difference, and in your life.

If it’s your grandchild, or wife, or friend who survives today because of mandatory child safety seats or backup lights or cell phone restrictions, it’s impossible to prove. If they’re one of the 17,000 plus that were not killed on our highways in 2014 because of the passage of the NHTSA, Mr. Ryan, you can thank your lucky stars there was bipartisanship in 1966.

So Mr. McConnell, isn’t it worth trying to save a few lives from being firearms victims by adopting mandatory gun owner education, or tougher background checks, or restricting magazine sizes? Isn’t it at least reasonable to sit at the table and see what you can cooperatively create to save one life?

Make it personal. Because I can assure you, if one of your family members were to be the victim of firearm violence, thoughts and prayers, and a check from Mr. LaPierre won’t make you feel any better.